BLOG

SCOTT'S THOUGHTS

ARC-PA 5th Edition Standards: Presenting Data for Appendix 14B

ARC-PA 5th Edition Standards: Presenting Data for Appendix 14B

August 24, 20222 min read

Welcome back! Today, we continue unpacking ARC-PA’s 5th Edition Standards, Appendix 14 with a review of how to respond to the requirements in Appendix 14B. 

What does Appendix 14B require?

Appendix 14B requires that your PA Program submit data and analysis regarding how your enrolled students assess the sufficiency and effectiveness of administrative aspects of the program and the available institutional resources. Thus, anything defined in Appendix 14B needs to become part of your data collection process. 

For example, program administrative aspects include policies and procedures, and admissions processes and outcomes. In defining your program’s institutional resources, you should include whatever such resources support your program such as:

  • Financial resources

  • Human resources

  • Physical resources

  • Technology resources and support

  • Safety and security

  • Student services, which the glossary defines as academic advising, tutoring, career services, financial aid, student health, computing, and library resources and access

  • Support for faculty development, clinical site development, curriculum design and course selection, program assessment, and program diversity and inclusion.

Graphics/Tabular Displays

Include three years of data. If your program has been in operation for less than three years, simply include as much data as possible.

I recommend presenting data in a way that allows for appreciation of trends over time.

You may also reference data/analysis in other parts of the SSR.

Let’s look at a couple different ways to present your results.

Presenting Data for Appendix 14B

This is a five-point Likert Scale showing the average scores given by students in response to a series of review questions, with a response rate of 81%. It shows that there are some areas falling below the program’s benchmark of 3.5. You could extend the display to demonstrate three years and then highlight at which points benchmark was unmet. Highlight any areas that are below the program’s benchmark. Look for trends, then identify areas that need to be addressed. 

You can display data in different ways. The following is a Student Services Survey, which shows ratings over two years. Be certain that you define terms, years, and what the Likert score means.

ARC-PA 5th Edition Standards Presenting Data for Appendix 14B 2

I hope this has provided clarity on presenting your student body’s responses in annual review. We’ll continue examining Appendix 14C and how to best present your collected data on the effectiveness of your didactic curriculum in our next blog.

blog author image

Scott Massey

With over three decades of experience in PA education, Dr. Scott Massey is a recognized authority in the field. He has demonstrated his expertise as a program director at esteemed institutions such as Central Michigan University and as the research chair in the Department of PA Studies at the University of Pittsburgh. Dr. Massey's influence spans beyond practical experience, as he has significantly contributed to accreditation, assessment, and student success. His innovative methodologies have guided numerous PA programs to ARC-PA accreditation and improved program outcomes. His predictive statistical risk modeling has enabled schools to anticipate student results. Dr Massey has published articles related to predictive modeling and educational outcomes. Doctor Massey also has conducted longitudinal research in stress among graduate Health Science students. His commitment to advancing the PA field is evident through participation in PAEA committees, councils, and educational initiatives.

Back to Blog
ARC-PA 5th Edition Standards: Presenting Data for Appendix 14B

ARC-PA 5th Edition Standards: Presenting Data for Appendix 14B

August 24, 20222 min read

Welcome back! Today, we continue unpacking ARC-PA’s 5th Edition Standards, Appendix 14 with a review of how to respond to the requirements in Appendix 14B. 

What does Appendix 14B require?

Appendix 14B requires that your PA Program submit data and analysis regarding how your enrolled students assess the sufficiency and effectiveness of administrative aspects of the program and the available institutional resources. Thus, anything defined in Appendix 14B needs to become part of your data collection process. 

For example, program administrative aspects include policies and procedures, and admissions processes and outcomes. In defining your program’s institutional resources, you should include whatever such resources support your program such as:

  • Financial resources

  • Human resources

  • Physical resources

  • Technology resources and support

  • Safety and security

  • Student services, which the glossary defines as academic advising, tutoring, career services, financial aid, student health, computing, and library resources and access

  • Support for faculty development, clinical site development, curriculum design and course selection, program assessment, and program diversity and inclusion.

Graphics/Tabular Displays

Include three years of data. If your program has been in operation for less than three years, simply include as much data as possible.

I recommend presenting data in a way that allows for appreciation of trends over time.

You may also reference data/analysis in other parts of the SSR.

Let’s look at a couple different ways to present your results.

Presenting Data for Appendix 14B

This is a five-point Likert Scale showing the average scores given by students in response to a series of review questions, with a response rate of 81%. It shows that there are some areas falling below the program’s benchmark of 3.5. You could extend the display to demonstrate three years and then highlight at which points benchmark was unmet. Highlight any areas that are below the program’s benchmark. Look for trends, then identify areas that need to be addressed. 

You can display data in different ways. The following is a Student Services Survey, which shows ratings over two years. Be certain that you define terms, years, and what the Likert score means.

ARC-PA 5th Edition Standards Presenting Data for Appendix 14B 2

I hope this has provided clarity on presenting your student body’s responses in annual review. We’ll continue examining Appendix 14C and how to best present your collected data on the effectiveness of your didactic curriculum in our next blog.

blog author image

Scott Massey

With over three decades of experience in PA education, Dr. Scott Massey is a recognized authority in the field. He has demonstrated his expertise as a program director at esteemed institutions such as Central Michigan University and as the research chair in the Department of PA Studies at the University of Pittsburgh. Dr. Massey's influence spans beyond practical experience, as he has significantly contributed to accreditation, assessment, and student success. His innovative methodologies have guided numerous PA programs to ARC-PA accreditation and improved program outcomes. His predictive statistical risk modeling has enabled schools to anticipate student results. Dr Massey has published articles related to predictive modeling and educational outcomes. Doctor Massey also has conducted longitudinal research in stress among graduate Health Science students. His commitment to advancing the PA field is evident through participation in PAEA committees, councils, and educational initiatives.

Back to Blog

Don't miss out on future events!

Subscribe to our newsletter

© 2024 Scott Massey Ph.D. LLC

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use